E 100

The article requires more development info, as well as redoing the images if possible.

Overview

Entwicklungsfahrzeug 100
General Data
Type	Super Heavy Tank
Place of Origin	Germany (Third Reich)
Designed by	Krupp
Designed	1942 - 1945
Manufacturer	Adler, Henschel
Produced	1943-1944 (upkeep till 1945)
Number Built	1 Hull
Designations
Company Designation	Tiger-Maus
Development
Developed From	Panzerkampfwagen VIII
Armament
Main Gun	12,8cm KwK 44 L/55
Main Gun Sights	TWZF 1 (3x, 10°)
Traverse	360° electric
Elevation	-7° to +30° electric
Coaxial Gun	7,5cm KwK 44 L/24 (200 rounds) 7.92x57mm Mauser MG 34 (shared 1000 rounds)
Pintle / AA Gun	7.92x57mm Mauser MG 34 (shared 1000 rounds)
Turrets	E-100 Turm
Fire Height	2.450m
Defence
Armour Type	Welded
Armour Layout	40 - 200mm
Misc Specs
Crew	6 (Commander, Gunner, Loader, Loader, Driver, Radio Operator)
Internal Communication	Yes
External Communication	FuG 5
Rangefinder	Horizontal range finder
Dimensions
Weight	123,500kg
Length	Hull: 8.733m w/ gun: 11.073m
Width	4.480m
Height	3.375m
Barrel Overhang	2.340m
Wheelbase	3.075m
Automotive
Engine	Maybach HL 230 P30
Power/Weight	4.8hp/t
Engine Characteristics	V-12, water-cooled, 23L, 600hp@2500rpm
Transmission/Gearbox	OG 40 12 16B
Gears	8 forward, 4 reverse
Ground Pressure	1.26kg/cm²
Ground Clearance	0.50m
Fuel Capacity	2050L Gasoline/Petrol
Operational Range	Onroad: 160km Offroad: 100km
Speed	Onroad: 23km/h
Trench Crossing	2.90m
Maximum Fording Depth	1.65m
Suspension
Suspension	Belleville Washer Coil Spring
Maximum Grade	30°
Vertical Obstacles	0.85m
Roadwheels	8 dual interleaved
Roadwheel Materials	Steel
Drive Sprocket	Front, double
Idler Sprocket	Rear, triple
Track Type	Dual center guide, wide dry single pin, steel
Pitch	150mm
Track Ground Contact	4.900m
Links	53
Steering System	Henschel L801 Zweiradien-Getriebe
Track Width	1000mm

The Entwicklungsfarhzeug 100 (E 100) is a German prototype super heavy tank.

Official Names

• Porsche-Maus (150t) - 1942
• Mäuschen (155t) - 1942
• Mäuschen (150t) - 1942
• Tiger-Maus - 1942
• Einheitsfahrzeug E 100 - 1944
• Entwicklungsfahrzeug 100 - 1944

Early Development

On 11 September 1942, the idea of a 150 metric ton tank design to compete with the Porsche-Maus was discussed during a meeting with Generalmajor Fichtner, Oberstleutnant Holzhäuer, Oberstleutnant Krohn (of Wa Prüf 6), and Obering. Wölfert (of Krupp). During the meeting they discussed whether another 150t tank was a plausible use of time. Wölfert of Krupp asked if there was any available information about more powerful engines and transmissions, Holzhäuer of Wa Prüf 6 stated that Maybach had been developing the HL 230 which was capable of reaching 1000hp with a special fuel at increased compression. Future discussion was to take place with the Minister für Bewaffnung und Munitions, and in four weeks with the Panzerkommission.

On 17 November 1942, Krupp met with the Panzerkommission, In 6, and Wa Prüf 6 at Min.f.Bew.u.Mun to discuss their conceptual design. Krupp's proposal was to be submitted quickly, with a decision of whether the Krupp or Porsche design is accepted for production.

Krupp submitted conceptual design W1672 that was created before the latest requirements were made. It had Raupenkästen (track boxes) that would have to be uninstalled for transport by rail, allowing the width of the vehicle to be 3.070m. In drawing W1671, ground pressure was only 0.8kg/cm², where-as the requirement was 1.1 to 1.2kg/cm².

On 23 November 1942, the use of components from the Tiger II were used to shorten development time, as proposed by Oberstleutnant Holzhäuer. The drive train from the Tiger II would allow for a horsepower-to-weight ratio of 4.5 for a 155t tank, allowing for a maximum speed of 20km/h, compared to the 45km/h for the Tiger II. If using the steering unit from the Tiger II, the top speed would be reduced further to 13km/h. A new steering unit was needed, capable of handling 800hp, instead of 360hp. Possible issues that were foreseen about the maneuverability, was driving on an incline.

Tiger-Maus

On 25 November 1942, in an internal meeting at Krupp, the development of the Maus was discussed.

Proposed engines

Company	Make	Cooling	hp	rpm
Daimler-Benz	DB 603*		1375	2300
Daimler-Benz	MB 501	water	1200 / 1500
Daimler-Benz	MB 503	water	1200
Daimler-Benz	MB 507	water	800 / 1000	2200 / 2400
Maybach	HL 230		700

^{*Porsche was rumoured to use this engine for their Maus.}

The HL 230 and MB 507 were to be used if there was an issue meeting deadlines.

Proposed transmissions

Company	Make	hp	Shifting Range
Maybach	OG 40 12 16* Olvargetriebe	800	1:16
Maybach	OG 40 12 16B Olvargetriebe	1200	1:16
ZF	12 EV 170 elektromagnetische Getriebe	770	1:15.48
ZF	AK 7-200 Allklauen Getriebe	800	1:13.4

^{*Used in a trial Tiger I.}

The steering unit did not have any choices available, so Krupp had to develop one for the vehicle. The final drive needed to be newly designed as well, Gruppe Wölfert started development on this.

On 30 November 1942, in Krupp Drawing W1674, the Maus (170 ton) had a chassis weighing 122,500kg, of which the armour hull weighed 82,000kg. 32 650mm roadwheels were included, with the MB 507 engine capable of 1200hp. The turret was to fit a 15cm KwK L/37 (50 rounds) and a 7,5cm KwK L/24 (100 rounds). Machine guns on the vehicle had 4,500 rounds available. A crew of six manned the vehicle.

On 1 December 1942, Krupp's Maus-Fahrgestell was discussed with Oberbaurat Kniepkamp. Drawing W1674 was presented. The design had the removable track boxes like the earlier designs, and the turret mounted in the center. Wa Prüf 6 preferred this design over the earlier ones, however noted that development of a new steering unit would take too long, and that the track boxes would take more time as they haven't had previous experience with such a design.

Wa Prüf 6 concluded that Krupp could produce a Maus the fastest, as long as they use components from the Tiger II, specifically the drive train. Krupp was informed that they should send a proposal. The hull and track ground contact was lengthened for the larger installation diameter of the turret. Wa Prüf 6 proposed the Maybach OG 40 12 16 transmission or the ZF 12 EV 170 as possibilities. ZF informed Krupp that the shifting times were too long for a vehicle with such low power reserves. The vehicle was to have a free suspension with rubber-saving roadwheels. Separate tracks for loading and driving were to be included. Ground pressure was about 1.1kg/cm², and opposing rail traffic had a 3270mm loading width.

The Henschel Lenkgetriebe L801 was possible to use by shortening the track contact length and widening the wheel base, if the weight of 130t and maximum speed of 22 to 25km/h is not exceeded. Turret armour also had to be thinner to reduce turret weight.

The Maybach HL 230 engine was to be used, it would allow 5.4hp/t (proposal W1674 had 7hp/t). The new model was expected to be produced faster than previous models, and that issues foreseen about the new transmission were not expected.

On 7 December 1942, Krupp had finished calculating speeds for the Mäuschen (130t) Drawing W1677. The engine was the same as the Tiger II, with a maximum speed of 22.5km/h when governed. Maximum speed with the Henschel Lenkgetriebe is 21.5km/h. Increasing the power beyond its intended capability by 12% would have a maximum speed of 23km/h and a gear ratio of 1:23.1. The design had the chassis weighing 83.4t, the hull weighing 52t. There were 32 800mm diameter roadwheels, with 1100mm wide tracks. The HL 230 engine, the OG 40 12 16B transmission, and the Henschel L801 Lenkgetrieb were used, and a 1200L fuel tank. The turret fit a 15cm L/37 (40 rounds) and 7,5cm L/24 (75 rounds), the overall turret weighed 45.5t. 4500 rounds were allocated to the machine gun. A crew of six operated the vehicle.

On 8 December 1942, Krupp was scheduled to present the latest design to Wa Prüf 6. Obering. Wölfert met with Holzhäuer, Crohn, and Kniepkamp to discuss the 130t Maus (W1677), with the turret in the center. Wa Prüf 6 were enthusiastic about the design. Noted advantages the Tiger-Maus had over the Porsche-Maus;

• Steering ratio of 1:1.43 (compared to 1:2.5)
• Ground pressure of 1.1kg/cm² (compared to 1:1.27)
• Rail travel without opposing traffic.
• 40t lower weight, less raw materials and labor required.
• Lower fuel consumption at 130t compared to 170t.

The speed and armour were considered sufficient, however disadvantages that had to be accepted were that different tracks (Verladekette) would have to be installed for rail transport, and the low power-to-weight ratio of 5.4hp/t.

The project was to gain significant favour if the weight was reduced further. Especially with a lighter turret. The layout with the turret in the rear (W1681) noted the following disadvantages;

• The center of gravity is 400mm further back.
• The submersion system the telescopic tube from the Tiger can't be completely adopted.
• The engine compartment compared to the Panther/Tiger II has to be changed.
• The crew would suffer from the increased heat from a forward-mounted engine.
• The crew would be separated, the driver and turret are not close together.

Kniepkamp allowed Krupp to install either leaf spring of torsion bars suspension, as he believed at the slow speed of the vehicle, the spring softness wouldn't be of major importance. Mass production of this vehicle was considered, and the first simplified design of the Maus was to be attempted by Fall 1943. Krupp suggested to Kniepkamp, that because of the near deadline, they should get support from Wa Prüf 6 and eventually MAN for assistance with the suspension.

Later on 8 December 1942, Wölfert of Krupp met with Hdl.Saur of Min.f.Bew.u.Mun. Krupp proposed that their Tiger-Maus be developed in parallel to the Porsche-Maus. There has been no doubt in potential immediate mass production of the model. Saur stated that he agreed with this decision, but must get approval from Minister Speer before a decision was made.

End of the Tiger-Maus

On 15 December 1942, Krupp was informed that work on the weaker Maus design with Tiger components should cease, as Oberstleutnant Holzhäuer, after consulting with Chef.H. Rust, decided that only the Porsche-Maus with the Krupp-Turm was to be produced.

On 17 December 1942, Krupp met with Wa Prüf 6 to discuss the 130t Maus with Tiger components. Oberstleutnant Holzhäuer mentioned that in a meeting on the 2nd of December, Prof. Porsche was authorized to build a Maus in accordance with the previously submitted designs because he had promised delivery in Summer 1943. Wa Prüf 6 thought that a 130t Maus with Tiger components would be useful, but previous issues with the Tigers being developed in parallel meant that parallel projects were to be avoided. In regards to the motor, Oberbaurat Kniepkamp stated that a super-charged Maybach trial motor with at least 1000hp was planned to be ready in September 1943, and ZF, Maybach, A.E.G, and Voith were developing a hydro-mechanisches Schalt- und Lenkgetrieb (hydro-mechanical transmission and steering unit). Krupp intends to meet Minister Speer or Hdl. Saur to obtain a development contract for the 130t Tiger-Maus.

On 31 December 1942, Oberstleutnant Holzhäuer informed Krupp that after meeting with Hdl. Saur, production of the Krupp Tiger-Maus was to be proposed directly to Hitler. Krupp would also travel to the Führerhauptquarier, and asked that Dr. Müller bring along the necessary supporting documents on the vehicle.

From 3 to 5 January 1943, as Item 9, after comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each vehicle, Hitler decided that the Porsche design was to be accepted for production.

Adler E 100

At a meeting on 18 March 1944, Obering. Wölfert of Krupp learned about the Einheitsfahrzeug E 100. Min.Rat. Kniepkamp of Wa Prüf 6 was informed that designs from Direktor Jenschke of Adler, were to be picked up by Herr Halberkamp from the Alder plant in Frankfurt. Inspection of a wooden model was to follow in about one week.

On 17 May 1944, Obering. Rabe of Porsche, reported seeing a design for a turret that had been adopted for the E 100, it weighed only 35t. It had a sloped front plate, a 12,8cm main gun, and a 7,5cm gun mounted above. The only difference between the E 100 turret and the Maus II turret (Bz 3269), was that the E 100 turret had thinner armour plates.

WIP

Gallery

Germany (Deutsches Reich) Land Vehicles 1919 - 1945

Half-Tracked Vehicles
Offensive / Defensive	SPAA	2cm Fla.K. 30 auf Fgst. le.Zgkw. 1t • 2cm Fla.K. 38 auf Fgst. le.Zgkw. 1t • 2cm Fla.K. 38 (Sf.) auf le.Zgkw. 1t • 2cm Fla.K. 38 Vierling (Sf.) auf m.Zgkw. 8t • 3,7cm Fla.K. 43/1 auf Sfl. s.W.S. • 5cm Fla.K. 41 (Sf.) auf m.Zgkw 5t • 8,8cm Fla.K. 18 (Sfl.) auf s.Zgkw 12t • 8,8cm Fla.K. 37 (Sfl.) auf s.Zgkw 18t
	Armoured Recon	le.S.P.W. (2cm) • le.S.P.W. (3,7cm) aA • le.S.P.W. (3,7cm) nA • Pz.Spw. RK A
	Fire Support	le.S.P.W. (7,5cm) • le.S.P.W. (s.Pz.B. 41)
	SPM	8cm R-vielfachwerfer auf Fahgestell S 303(f) • leichter Schützenpanzerwagen (schwerer Granatwerfer) • mittlerer Schützenpanzerwagen S307(f)
	SPRA	8cm R.W. auf Fgst. S303(f) • 8cm Reihenwerfer auf Fahgestell S303(f)
	SPATG	5cm PaK 38 (Sf) auf leichter Zugkraftwagen 1t • 7,5cm PaK 40 (Sf) auf Fahrgestell S 307(f) • 8,8cm FlaK 18 (Sf) auf schwerer Zugkraftwagen 12t • 8,8cm FlaK 37 (Sfl.) auf schwerer Zugkraftwagen 18t • leichter Schützenpanzerwagen mit Sfl 5cm PaK 38 L/60 • Panzerjäger S307(f) mit 7,5cm PaK 40 L/46
Utility	Ammunition Carriers	l.gp.Mun.Tr.Kw. • le.Mun.Pz.Wg. (A • B)
	Command	le.Beob.Pz.Wg. n.A.
	Communication & Cable Related	kl.Kett.Krad. f. Fe.Kab. • kl.Kett.Krad. f. s.Fe.Kab. • leichter Fernsprechpanzerwagen • leichter Funkpanzerwagen
	Engineering	m.S.P.W. (Pi)
	Observation, Spotting & Survey	leichter gepanzerter Beobachtungskraftwagen • leichter Beobachtungspanzerwagen Alte • le.Messtrupp-Pz.Wg. • m.S.P.W. (IR)
	Transport & Towing	gepanzerter Transportkraftwagen P380(f) • kl.Kett.Krad • leichter Schützenpanzerwagen Series • leichter Schützenpanzerwagen Alte • le.S.P.W. n.A. • le.S.P.W. U304(f) • le.Zgkw 1t • le.Zgkw 3t • le.Zgkw S307(f) • m.gep.Zgkw S303(f) • m.Zgkw 5t • m.Zgkw 8t • S.P.W. M2(a) • S.P.W. M3(a) • s.Zgkw 12t • s.Zgkw 18t • Zgkw P302(b) • Zgkw P302(f) • Zgkw P304(f)